IMPLICATIONS: Numerous officials insist it is necessary for Georgia to establish territorial integrity in South Ossetia not only because it will unite the unofficially divided region of Shida Kartli—the “heart of Georgia”, but because it will allow Georgia to establish permanent customs control and border mechanisms, thus enabling economic and social development. Until then, Georgia’s heartland is divided in half, and combating the contraband entering Georgia from Tskhinvali will be impossible. This situation not only destabilizes Georgia, but perpetuates an endemic system of corruption. Confident that Russia would not interfere in a Tskhinvali revolution, experts such as Temuri Yakobashvili stress that military interference would be a political disaster for Russian authorities. If successful, Georgia would have to consider how to administer South Ossetia, officially a part of Shida Kartli, but de facto independent. Would Tskhinvali region and the neighboring Java district form a separate administrative unit with a special status, or will they be officially incorporated into Shida Kartli as districts? For the last few months, Georgian authorities have been setting up local administrative offices in the Georgian-controlled territories of Liakhvi and Proni Gorges to meet immediate social welfare, economic, and security needs. Civil society activists point to the lack of leadership that Saakashvili’s government can turn to if the time comes to form a new government, though many expect that free and fair local elections might solve this problem. If contraband continues to wither away, authorities will have to address the potential for a South Ossetian economic decline. While authorities emphasize that money earned from contraband goes straight into the pockets of “high officials’” and criminals, they realize that many Ossetians’ livelihood depends it. Georgians living in the conflict zone claim to harbor no ill-will towards the Ossetians. However, those Ossetians who harbor dark memories of atrocities committed against them during the 1990 to 1992 Georgian-Ossetian conflict will be more difficult to entice. One official, who himself claimed to have been tortured by Ossetian forces while defending his village, stressed that Georgians and Ossetians in the conflict zone commonly refer to each other as “two brothers”. He added, however, that there are Ossetians who will never accept Georgian rule. He thought some might choose to emigrate to North Ossetia or to other parts of Russia, which could pose problems for the Russian North Caucasus. Probably the most significant challenge ahead would be the rehabilitation of Ossetian youth who have been fed anti-Georgian, pro-Russian propaganda from birth. One Tskhinvali-based NGO leader described how she recently overhead one young child describing how he would take his father’s gun and kill any Georgians he found on his territory. A Kmara activist noted that these youth are the most likely to become aggressive toward Georgians. Ossetian children grew up with a memorial in the center of Tskhinvali that states, “Buried here are those killed by Georgians”. Moreover, many Ossetian children do not speak Georgian and grew up speaking Russian or Ossetian.
CONCLUSIONS: The socio-economic incentives President Saakashvili is offering the South Ossetian communities directly addresses many concerns a revolution would raise. If Georgian authorities are successful in cutting off the Ossetians from their primary source of income, smuggling, Tskhinvali authorities will face some tough decisions. Civil society activists stress that as long as President Saakashvili can deliver on economic benefits and security guarantees, Ossetians might be willing to unite peacefully with Georgia. However, considering an Ossetian fear that Georgians wish to “conquer Tskhinvali”, Saakashvili has no assurance that Tskhinvali residents will not embrace a violent response as Georgians appear to hover over Tskhinvali. Moreover, it remains unclear how Russia will respond to future events.
AUTHOR’S BIO: Theresa Freese is a graduate of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at the Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C. and is currently conducting research on Georgia’s regional reforms.