IMPLICATIONS: But beyond purely economic and political links, India has also upgraded its strategic and military profile in Central Asia. It has now openly confirmed the presence of an air base at Ayni in Tajikistan. This is only the second Indian air base beyond India’s frontiers (the first is in Sri Lanka), but it testifies to India’s new interest in and capability for power projection missions as well as its ability to threaten Pakistan from the rear and deny it a strategic hinterland. Indian officials are also busily negotiating deals with Central Asian governments like Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan whereby India will either buy Soviet era military equipment like Ilyushin-76 transport aircraft (suitable for transporting troops or for mounting an aerial AWCS-like radar that it obtained from Israel, the Phalcon) or sell weapons to local governments. India is also discussing joint training, research and development initiatives with those states. But beyond obtaining access to energy projects, increased trade access through greater trade and participation in infrastructure projects and these military deals, the overarching Indian objective is quite clear and was summed up by an Indian official at the Ministry of Defense who commented on Defense Minister George Fernandes’ recent visits to Kyrgyzstan and Kazakstan. “The visit is not that significant in terms of defense procurement. The accent is on building strategic space for India in the region and to encircle Pakistan.” These words speak for themselves. Central Asia has now become an important theater in the Indo-Pakistani rivalry that endangers the security of South Asia, making each region’s security in some measure contingent upon the developments in the other region. Central Asia is thus a prominent element in both those countries’ quest for greater strategic space, a phenomenon with particular significance for India. This is because New Delhi is clearly embarked upon a strategic quest for influence throughout Asia, and religious issues are not standing in the way of its rather successful quest for enhanced standing, prestige, presence, and influence from the Middle East to the Straits of Malacca. India’s multi-dimensional approach to Central Asia resembles its approach to these other areas as well since in all cases economics and defense issues are combined, if not intertwined.
CONCLUSIONS: In this respect India’s rising profile in Central Asia confirms the predictions made over a decade ago in many quarters that by the beginning of the twenty-first century India would be a major power to reckon with in Asia beyond South Asia and a force capable of projecting power far beyond its formal borders. Those prophecies are now coming true. Consequently not only must any analysis or assessment of security trends in Central Asia take India into account, but India’s presence in this area is likely to rise and probably come into political and economic rivalry with that of other major Asian players like China. Inasmuch as most governments’ quest for influence here is predicated upon an effort to thwart other rivals’ designs upon Central Asia, the addition of India to the mix will surely make the new great game still more complex. That multi-state rivalry embracing regional governments and distant powers like the United States will surely continue to be and become even more complex as time passes, a rivalry that encompasses all the traditional dimensions of statecraft. Similarly, it is also clear that as far as Central Asia’s future is concerned, India will not only play the game vigorously but that it is there to stay.
AUTHOR’S BIO: Professor Stephen Blank, Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013. The views expressed here do not in any way represent those of the U.S. Army, Defense Department or the U.S. Government.