IMPLICATIONS: Soviet official Islam was rigidly controlled with a central administration and four geographically based muftiyats. Since perestroika, Russian official Islam has broken into two major muftiyats (led by Tadjuddin and his main rival Ravil Gaynutdin) and dozens of lesser groups, all with overlapping spheres of influence. Nearly all the half-dozen major Islamic leaders in Russia are Tatar, with the exception of the powerful Duma deputy, Abdul-Wahid Niyazov, a half-Tatar convert to Islam. While most are related by marriage into a spiritually powerful Tatar clan, the Muslim leaders spend an inordinate amount of time accusing each other of promoting \'Wahhabism\' or various obscure heresies. In contrast to the silence that met the Daghestani declaration of jihad, there was a furor throughout Russia at Tadjuddin\'s statements. Movladi Udagov, a leader of Islamic-minded Chechen separatist groups based in Qatar, accused Tadjuddin of being an agent of the FSB (Federal Security Service), and proclaimed the imam to be an apostate, the most serious charge in Islam. Siberian-based Mufti Nafigulla Ashirov initially spoke of \'tens of thousands\' of Russian Muslims ready to fight in Iraq, but later said that no Russian Muslim took Tadjuddin\'s declaration seriously. Despite being a frequent visitor to Iraq himself, Chechnya\'s Kremlin-appointed governor Akhmad Khadyrov, a former Mufti of Chechnya, called Tadjuddin\'s declaration \'mindless self-promotion\'. Even the chief Mufti of his own power base in Bashkortostan failed to support Tadjuddin. Tadjuddin\'s most serious challenger for President Putin\'s favor is a former protégé, Mufti Ravil Gaynutdin, leader of the Council of Muftiis of Russia (SMR). In recent years, Gaynutdin has attempted to make Moscow the capital of Russian Islam, with the financial and political aid of Russian Mayor Yuri Luzhkov. Gaynutdin was scathing in his response to Tadjuddin\'s jihad, calling the Mufti a \'false prophet\', whose call for jihad carried \'neither clerical nor legal nor moral force\'. The Russian Justice Ministry warned that any military aid or intervention in Iraq by Russian citizens would be subject to criminal investigation and there were threats from the Prosecutor-General\'s office that the TSDUMR could be disbanded for inciting religious hatred. In their attempts to garner the Kremlin\'s support, Gainutdin, Tadjuddin and other leading Muftis all proclaimed the legitimacy of the recent referendum on Chechnya\'s future in the Russian Federation. Tadjuddin made sure to note that his organization was the first to support the referendum, calling it \'a necessary measure against terrorists\'. The referendum campaign was accompanied by several gestures from Russian authorities to reach out to the Russian Islamic community at a time when Muslims are alarmed at the growing patronage of Russian Orthodoxy by the Kremlin.
CONCLUSIONS: Lacking popular support, the Daghestan jihad amounted only to a war of words. The demonstrations of anti-American militancy in Ufa and Makhachkala appear to be unrelated. There is little contact between the leaders of the North Caucasus muftiyats and those in the Volga/Urals region. Islamic revival in the latter area is closely tied to Tatar and Bashkir nationalism. Tadjuddin\'s declaration followed a fractious meeting in late March of all Russia\'s Islamic leaders, a failed attempt by the Kremlin to unify official Islam as in Soviet times. Tadjuddin was one of the \'young Imams\' who emerged from Central Asian religious schools in the 1980s. These individuals opposed the passive pro-Soviet conduct of the older spiritual leaders and actually succeeded in gaining a number of concessions from the government before religious laws were relaxed in 1990, permitting the modern Russian Islamic revival. By the early 90\'s, Tadjuddin was himself being challenged by a new generation of \'young Imams\' on nearly identical charges, with the addition of schizophrenia. Tadjuddin\'s jihad may thus be regarded as a desperate attempt to exploit public opinion to outmaneuver his rivals in official structures and the young Tatar radicals. There remains the possibility that the ever-pliant Tadjuddin was encouraged by the Kremlin to adopt a militant pose, a discrete means of communicating Moscow\'s displeasure with Washington\'s campaign in Iraq.
AUTHOR’S BIO: Dr. Andrew McGregor is Director of Aberfoyle International Security Analysis, Toronto.