Friday, 08 December 2017

Anti-Kadyrov Chechens are Targeted in Ukraine

Published in Analytical Articles
Rate this item
(5 votes)

 By Huseyn Aliyev

December 11, 2017, the CACI Analyst

The recent assassination of anti-Moscow Chechen activist Amina Okueva in Kyiv is yet another link in the chain of targeted killings of Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov’s opponents across the former Soviet Union and beyond. A former member of “Djokhar Dudayev” battalion, which fought against pro-Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine, Okueva has been a target of pro-Kadyrov Chechens since her engagement in armed conflict in Ukraine. The event demonstrates Kadyrov’s capacity to persistently hunt down his enemies well outside the borders of Russian Federation. The inability and unwillingness of Ukrainian security services to protect Chechen volunteers, who participated in the campaign against Russian aggression in Donbas, leaves them vulnerable to persecution by Kadyrov’s associates.

  

 

 

 Screen_Shot_2017-12-08_at_2.00.21_PM.png

BACKGROUND: A vehicle driven by Okueva’s husband Adam Osmaev came under small arms fire on the outskirts of Kyiv on October 30. While Osmaev sustained only minor injuries, Okueva died from bullet wounds to the head. Efforts by Ukrainian security services to identify and apprehend the assailants have thus far been ineffective.

Okueva was a member of the political movement “Free Caucasus,” she took part in the Second Chechen War, participated in the Euromaidan events in Ukraine and after the start of the Donbas War became a volunteer of the Chechen pro-Ukrainian “Djokhar Dudayev” battalion. She was also an active critic of both Vladimir Putin’s and Kadyrov’s policies. As a former member of the Chechen militant underground, Okueva was among the personal enemies of Kadyrov.

Notwithstanding the importance of Okueva for Kadyrov, sources within Ukraine’s security services are prone to believe that the actual target of the October 30 attack was her husband. Osmaev served as the head of the “Djokhar Dudayev” battalion since its founder, Isa Munaev, died in combat in 2015. He was also a well-known member of the Chechen secular separatist movement, struggling for the re-creation of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria. Above all, Osmaev is accused of plotting to assassinate Putin during the 2012 presidential elections campaign.

The October 30 assault was not the first attempt to assassinate Osmaev and Okueva. On June 1, the couple was attacked in Kyiv by a gunman who managed to inflict injuries to both of them. The contract killer, who was himself injured during the incident, was identified as Arthur Kurmakaev (“Dingo”), a well-known member of the Chechen mafia and a suspect in several Kadyrov-sanctioned assassinations. Along with assassinations of Kadyrov’s enemies in Russia and Chechnya, Kurmakaev was also under investigation for the murder of Kadyrov’s former body guard in Vienna, Austria.

IMPLICATIONS: Official statements released by Ukrainian investigators indicate two main possible motives behind the attack on Chechen volunteers. As suggested by Anton Heraschenko, adviser to the head of Ukraine’s Interior Ministry, the attack may have been conducted by Russian Special Forces in order to target prominent members of the counter-separatist forces. The assault could also have been another attempt by the Chechen president to settle scores with his enemies abroad. Another version, put forward by the Caucasus Knot agency, suggests that the assassination attempt on Osmaev was conducted by members of the Chechen diaspora in Europe, who financed his battalion. According to this version, Osmaev acquired large sums of money from Chechen donors in Europe and has failed to provide a credible account as to how this funding was spent.

In a statement on November 1, Kadyrov denied his connection to the Kyiv attack and accused Ukrainian secret services of assassinating Okueva, in order to “distract the international community from ongoing anti-government protests and to yet again blame Russia for its problems.” Kadyrov pointed out that Okueva had nothing to do with Chechnya, because she was born in Ukraine to a Chechen father and Ukrainian mother and had never continuously lived in the North Caucasian republic. Bearing in mind that Kadyrov rarely comments on Ukraine’s domestic affairs, let alone such relatively low-level incidents as the October 30 attack on Osmaev family, suggests that Chechen president was following the event with interest.

The events in Kyiv have two possible implications. First, an assault on members of the anti-Moscow Chechen community indicate that Kadyrov – who is known to have previously ordered and financed similar attacks – pursues his long-term strategy of exterminating his opponents regardless of their geographical location. His ability to mobilize and command pro-Moscow Chechens abroad, or to dispatch his hand-picked assassins directly from Chechnya or Russia, remains unchanged. Targets of such attacks are selected not necessarily in order of their importance for Kadyrov – Osmaev is a rather insignificant person when it comes to the security of the Chechen regime – but based on the availability of suitable individuals to conduct an attack at a particular location. For example, Kurmakaev, who was sent to assassinate the Osmaev family, had a Ukrainian passport and was supposedly residing in the country. 

Second, veterans of the Donbas War, particularly from among non-ethnic Ukrainians, have become vulnerable to targeted assassinations organized by pro-Moscow forces. Ukraine seems to be unable and unwilling to provide adequate protection for non-Ukrainian volunteers of the counter-terrorist operation, most of whom are considered foreign fighters. This implies a bleak future for members of the Chechen battalion in Ukraine. The cessation of active combat in the Donbas War has resulted in decreasing financial support for the “Djokhar Dudayev” battalion from the Chechen diaspora in Europe, which will most likely encourage the remaining members of the battalion to return to their home countries in Europe, where many may face prosecution for participation in armed groups. 

CONCLUSIONS: As attacks on Kadyrov’s critics in Europe have decreased over the last several years, the head of Chechnya appears more poised to eradicating his opponents in the near abroad. Bearing in mind that the Chechen diaspora in the former Soviet republics is larger and more politically active than in the EU, Chechen special services may find it easier to recruit potential hit men. Investigations of nearly all Kadyrov-ordered targeted assassinations, including those committed in European countries and the U.S., have failed to produce a credible link connecting the crimes to Chechen president. As demonstrated by the case of Osmaev, who remained outside the Russian Federation for about five years, Kadyrov’s determination to destroy his opponents is not time-limited. Although it remains unclear whether Okueva was collateral damage rather than the key target, her death reduced the number of Kadyrov’s enemies and therefore was not left unnoticed by the Chechen leader. 

AUTHOR'S BIO: Huseyn Aliyev is a LKAS Research Fellow at the School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow. He specializes in armed conflicts, non-state armed groups, and informal practices. He is an author of “When informal institutions change. Institutional reforms and informal practices in the former Soviet Union” (University of Michigan Press, 2017). His most recent publications appeared in Third World Quarterly (2017), Terrorism and Political Violence (2017), Security Dialogue (2016), and International Security (2015).

Image source: By en.kremlin.ru accessed on 12.11. 2017

Read 2449 times Last modified on Friday, 08 December 2017

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Joint Center Publications

Article S. Frederick Starr, "Why Central Asia Counts", Middle East Insights, November 6, 2017

Article Mamuka Tsereteli, “Russian Aggression in the Black Sea Cannot Go Unanswered” The Hill, September 11, 2017

Article Bilahari Kausikan, Fred Starr, and Yang Cheng, “Asia’s Game of Thrones, Central Asia: All Together Now.” The American Interest, June 16,2017

Article Svante E. Cornell “The Raucous Caucasus” The American Interest, May 2, 2017

Resource Page "Resources on Terrorism and Radical Islamism in Central Asia", Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, April 11, 2017.

Silk Road Monograph Nicklas Norling, Party Problems and Factionalism in Soviet Uzbekistan: Evidence from the Communist Party Archives, March 2017.

Oped Svante E. Cornell, "Russia: An Enabler of Jihad?", W. Martens Center for European Studies, January 16, 2017.

Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., The International Politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: The Original 'Frozen Conflict' and European Security, Palgrave, 2017. 

Article Svante E. Cornell, The fallacy of ‘compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria, European View, Volume 15, Issue 1, June 2016.

Silk Road Paper Shirin Akiner, Kyrgyzstan 2010: Conflict and Context, July 2016. 

Silk Road Paper John C. K. Daly, Rush to Judgment: Western Media and the 2005 Andijan ViolenceMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Jeffry Hartman, The May 2005 Andijan Uprising: What We KnowMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Johanna Popjanevski, Retribution and the Rule of Law: The Politics of Justice in Georgia, June 2015.

Book S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, eds., ·Putin's Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and its Discontents, Joint Center Monograph, September 2014.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter