Wednesday, 02 August 2000

DANGEROUS GAPS IN KAZAKHSTAN’S RELIGION LAWS

Published in Field Reports

By Maria Utyaganova, Student, American University in Kyrgyzstan, International Relations (8/2/2000 issue of the CACI Analyst)

During the Soviet era, the government "protected" the people from the influence of religious organizations and their propaganda. But with the proclamation of independence and sovereignty, religion in Kazakhstan and the belief in God are no longer considered a crime against society and the government. Religion is becoming an essential part of the spiritual culture of Kazakhstan that is a multi-confessional state.

During the Soviet era, the government "protected" the people from the influence of religious organizations and their propaganda. But with the proclamation of independence and sovereignty, religion in Kazakhstan and the belief in God are no longer considered a crime against society and the government. Religion is becoming an essential part of the spiritual culture of Kazakhstan that is a multi-confessional state. There are 373 Muslim and 14 Russian Orthodox congregations. Additionally, there are 39 Protestant, Catholic and other religious communities legally registered and operating in the republic. The influential role of religion in Kazakhstani civil society and politics is great. In connection with increased religious activity in the republic, the government is taking measures to prevent religious extremism, maintain stability by peaceful dialogue, without following confrontational means. Kazakhstan has legislated that October 18 is Spiritual Consensus and Peace Day.

In the Kazakhstan legal system, there are many gaps in religious legislation and many opportunities for illegal expansion of different religious teachings that could undermine stability and peace. One trial of a religious nature took place in Southern Kazakhstan in the end of 1998 and lasted almost year and a half. Two Arabic teachers, one from Egypt and one from Jordan, were accused of fomenting religious hostility and propaganda about the superiority of Muslims. They also distributed literature calling for the violent overthrow of the government. They were also accused of applying violence and force while working with their students. Both men were sent to Kazakhstan by a charitable organization abroad. Their courses of Arabic language instruction were approved by the Kazakhstan Ministry of Education, but it became clear that teaching the Arabic language was not the only purpose of their visit.

Their trial lasted from June 1998 until May 2000. During the trial, students and their parents recanted their original accusations against the teachers. But the original accusation of fomenting national and religious hostility among the peoples of Kazakhstan was supported by a June 8, 1998 videotape in which one man spoke Arabic and the other translated into Russian. He said, " Before Muslims had their own state, they had Caliphs heading the government. But right now Muslims do not have their own state, they do not have a Caliph who would unite them in one state". He also added, "Jews are the worst enemies of Allah. Allah cursed them."

The court pronounced its verdict at the end of the case. But after citing an amnesty ruling and upholding the goals of the Year 2000’s "year of unity and peace among generations," the accused were expelled from the country. The government plaintiff, who had worked in public persecution for 26 years, said he had never faced a trial like this. It was obvious from the case that the judicial investigators were very inexperienced in religious law. This case provided new knowledge and experience. Perhaps one of the Kazakhstan’s newspapers said it best: "Missionaries come and go, but they do not always bear good promises and charity."

Maria Utyaganova, Student, American University in Kyrgyzstan, International Relations.

Read 3335 times

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Staff Publications

Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 10.32.15 AMSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, U.S. Policy in Central Asia through Central Asian Eyes, May 2023.


Analysis Svante E. Cornell, "Promise and Peril in the Caucasus," AFPC Insights, March 30, 2023.

Oped S. Frederick Starr, Putin's War In Ukraine and the Crimean War), 19fourtyfive, January 2, 2023

Oped S. Frederick Starr, Russia Needs Its Own Charles de Gaulle,  Foreign Policy, July 21, 2022.

2206-StarrSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, Rethinking Greater Central Asia: American and Western Stakes in the Region and How to Advance Them, June 2022 

Oped Svante E. Cornell & Albert Barro, With referendum, Kazakh President pushes for reforms, Euractiv, June 3, 2022.

Oped Svante E. Cornell Russia's Southern Neighbors Take a Stand, The Hill, May 6, 2022.

Silk Road Paper Johan Engvall, Between Bandits and Bureaucrats: 30 Years of Parliamentary Development in Kyrgyzstan, January 2022.  

Oped Svante E. Cornell, No, The War in Ukraine is not about NATO, The Hill, March 9, 2022.

Analysis Svante E. Cornell, Kazakhstan’s Crisis Calls for a Central Asia Policy Reboot, The National Interest, January 34, 2022.

StronguniquecoverBook S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, Strong and Unique: Three Decades of U.S.-Kazakhstan Partnership, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, December 2021.  

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell, S. Frederick Starr & Albert Barro, Political and Economic Reforms in Kazakhstan Under President Tokayev, November 2021.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter