Wednesday, 04 September 2013

Traffic Accident Sparks Tensions between Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan

Published in Field Reports

By Arslan Sabyrbekov (the 04/09/2013 issue of the CACI Analyst)

On August 26, 2013, the Kyrgyz Foreign Ministry sent a note of protest to official Tashkent regarding a traffic accident involving Uzbek high ranking diplomats that, according to the reports, led to a scuffle. 

According to the information from the Kyrgyz Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), a car with an Uzbek Embassy license plate CMD 111 collided with another vehicle after midnight on August 23, 2013, near a night club in Bishkek. The eyewitnesses recorded that all passengers of the diplomatic vehicle were intoxicated, stepped out of their car, and assaulted the driver of the other vehicle causing physical injuries. According to the press officer of the Kyrgyz MIA, Uzbekistan’s Ambassador Komil Rashidov was also in the diplomatic car when the accident occurred. The press officer also stated that the immediate medical check of the other driver revealed no alcohol consumption. The other persons involved in the accident did not go through this check due to their diplomatic status. It was also reported that Uzbekistan’s Embassy in Bishkek refused to provide any comments regarding the incident.

This is not the first time that the Foreign Ministries of the two countries exchange protest notes. Only a few weeks prior to this incident, another diplomatic scandal erupted between the two neighbors, this time involving an official of the Kyrgyz Embassy in Uzbekistan, Kanatbek Sharshenbek. According to the news source Zamondosh, the Kyrgyz diplomat did not obey the traffic rules in Tashkent and used nationalistic rhetoric, insulted and injured the team of medical workers who arrived at the scene. The Kyrgyz Foreign Ministry immediately recalled its diplomat back to Bishkek and an investigation is underway.

In light of these developments, experts foresee further tensions between Bishkek and Tashkent. An independent member of the Kyrgyz Parliament, Ravshan Jeenbekov, believes that the diplomatic tensions will have a negative impact on the overall bilateral relations, which even before those incidents were quite frosty and antagonistic. Jeenbekov stressed the importance of using diplomatic tools to improve the relations, instead of exchanging protest notes.

The tensions between Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan have escalated sharply over the course of this year. On January 6, 2013, a major border incident occurred in Sokh, an Uzbek enclave on the territory of Kyrgyzstan. Residents of the village Hushar on the Uzbek side of the border attacked a newly constructed Kyrgyz border watchtower and illegally entered Kyrgyz territory. As a result of this incident, more than 30 Kyrgyz residents from a nearby village were captured and held hostage in the Sokh enclave. Following negotiations between officials of the two governments, those taken into custody were freed. Yet, instead of cooperating to examine the causes of the incident and find possible solutions, both sides simply traded accusations.

As history shows, ethnic tensions between various communities are common in the region, as are border incidents around areas which have not yet been delimited. According to Josef Lang from the Center for Eastern Studies, the scale of the events in the Sokh enclave demonstrates that there is a clear tendency for such conflicts to escalate. This was the first time when an ethnic conflict overlapped with mutual animosity between the two countries. Previous ethnic conflicts have mainly concerned citizens of Kyrgyzstan of different ethnic backgrounds. The illegal crossing of another country’s border and taking its citizens captive is alarming and reminiscent of the overall unstable situation in the region.

Experts are making unanimous calls to Uzbek and Kyrgyz authorities to intensify bilateral dialogue at all possible levels and show commitment and willingness to resolve border related issues, which have already cost a number of lives. Kyrgyz border officials recently shot dead two Uzbek counterparts on charges of illegal border crossing. 

Read 7098 times Last modified on Wednesday, 25 September 2013

Visit also





Staff Publications

Op-ed Mamuka Tsereteli & James Jay Carafano, The West Can't Forget What Russia Did To Georgia, 19FortyFive, August 6, 2021. 

Op-ed S. Frederick Starr & Michael Doran, To Avert Disaster in Afghanistan, Look to Central Asia, Wall Street Journal, July 11, 2021.

Op-ed S. Frederick Starr & Eldor Aripov, Can Afghanistan Be Part of An Integrated Central Asia? The National Interest, July 9, 2021.

Op-ed Mamuka Tsereteli and James Jay Carafano, Tsereteli & Carafano: Putin threatens Ukraine – here's the danger and what US, allies should do about it, Fox News, April 13, 2021.

Op-ed S. Enders Wimbish, US withdrawal from Afghanistan spells dangerous geopolitical realignments, The Hill, April 2, 2021.  

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell and S. Frederick Starr, Kazakhstan's Role in International Mediation under First President Nursultan Nazarbayev, November 2020.

Analysis Svante E. Cornell, How Did Armenia So Badly Miscalculate Its War with Azerbaijan? The National Interest, November 14, 2020.

Op-ed Svante E. Cornell, Halting the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan: Russian Peacekeeping is not the Solution Washington Times, October 20, 2020.

Analysis Svante E. Cornell, Can America Stop a Wider War between Armenia and Azerbaijan? The National Interest, October 5, 2020.

Article S. Frederick Starr, America Inches Toward a Serious Central Asia Strategy AFPC Defense Dossier, June 3, 2020.

Silk Road Paper Farrukh Irnazarov and Roman Vakulchuk, Discovering Opportunities in the Pandemic? Four Economic Response Scenarios for Central Asia, July 2020.  

 Book S. Frederick Starr, Eldar Ismailov, Nazim Muzaffarli, Basic Principles for the Rehabilitation of Azerbaijan’s Post-Conflict Territories, 2010.

Can Afghanistan Be Part of An Integrated Central Asia?

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.


Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst