Wednesday, 25 May 2011

GOVERNMENT INACTION BLAMED FOR RISING FOOD PRICES IN TAJIKISTAN

Published in Field Reports

By Alexander Sodiqov (5/25/2011 issue of the CACI Analyst)

As skyrocketing food prices become an increasingly salient trigger for social and political protests across the developing world, sharp rises in prices for basic foodstuffs in Tajikistan are contributing to a growing popular frustration with the government’s inability to control prices. The food costs in the country rose by up to 30 percent over the last two months, with meat and wheat flour prices jumping 50 percent in some areas. Although government officials expect a moderation in food prices later this year, analysts warn that the costs for major foodstuffs might rise again before Ramadan, the Islamic month of fasting, in August.

As skyrocketing food prices become an increasingly salient trigger for social and political protests across the developing world, sharp rises in prices for basic foodstuffs in Tajikistan are contributing to a growing popular frustration with the government’s inability to control prices. The food costs in the country rose by up to 30 percent over the last two months, with meat and wheat flour prices jumping 50 percent in some areas. Although government officials expect a moderation in food prices later this year, analysts warn that the costs for major foodstuffs might rise again before Ramadan, the Islamic month of fasting, in August.

Following sharp rises in wheat prices last year, price escalation has become a recurring trend in Tajikistan. The World Bank estimates that since last summer, the global rise in grain prices has led to a 3.6 percent increase in extreme poverty in Tajikistan. The latest price spike is predicted to have a devastating impact on the diets and disposable incomes of poor families, pushing more families into extreme poverty.

While some experts suggest that the recent price jump in the country is simply part of the global escalation in food prices, an increasing number of analysts argue that the situation in Tajikistan has been aggravated by the government’s foreign policy miscalculations and mismanagement of public resources. The surge in food costs in the country was triggered by Russia’s decision to increase tariffs on oil and oil products exported to Tajikistan by up to 5.3 percent starting from April 1, 2011. As Tajikistan imports more than 92 percent of its petroleum products from Russia, higher tariffs have led to gasoline and diesel prices in the country soaring by an average 30 percent. Higher fuel prices then caused an upsurge in the cost of foodstuffs and other basic goods.

Tajik government officials have described the higher tariffs on oil exports imposed by Moscow as an unfortunate development that Dushanbe had no other choice but to accept. Some critics, however, argue that the tariff increase could have been avoided by making political concessions to Russia. Such concessions might, for instance, have included granting Moscow permission to establish an airbase at the Ayni airfield near Dushanbe. Russia has long been known for using energy as a lever with its post-Soviet neighbors. While increasing dues on oil imports to Tajikistan, Moscow has kept low tariffs for imports to Kyrgyzstan, which hosts a Russian airbase.

Other critics believe that it was beyond the Tajik officials’ power to stop the increase in food prices. They argue, however, that the government was aware of the imminent price spike and could have used available financial resources for early intervention in the market to prevent such a drastic cost increase. Already in early March, Tajik president Emomali Rahmon warned about higher food costs and urged the country’s population to stock up on basic food items, including grains and beans, to prepare for escalating prices. Critics complain that despite the early warning to the population, the government continued squandering state resources on lavish construction projects in the capital, including the world’s tallest flagpole, a giant library, and a new museum. It is argued that these resources should have been used to control inflation, food and fuel costs, and support poor families which are hit hardest by rising food prices.

The government intervened in the food market only in mid-May. The authorities announced that they would spend US$ 58 million on food subsidies for the poorest families, helping them cope with price inflation. Another US$ 13 million was allocated for flour and fuel reserves which would be provided to the population at discounted prices. The government has also set up special commissions to procure meat and other foodstuffs directly from farmers and sell them on to the population without the involvement of intermediaries. Desperate to keep food prices low, the municipal authorities in Dushanbe set a cap on prices for wheat flour and meat in the capital, and enforced it by detaining butchers that defied the instructions.

It is difficult to assess the effectiveness of government interventions in the food market at this stage. Food prices in the country will most likely decrease soon as more farmers begin harvesting fruit and vegetables. The prices are not, however, likely to drop by more than 10 percent due to the high fuel costs. In order to better withstand global pressures, the Tajik government needs a long-term strategy to boost food production at home, including by promoting agricultural diversification and allowing farmers more control over the land they use.
Read 2511 times

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Staff Publications

Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 10.32.15 AMSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, U.S. Policy in Central Asia through Central Asian Eyes, May 2023.


Analysis Svante E. Cornell, "Promise and Peril in the Caucasus," AFPC Insights, March 30, 2023.

Oped S. Frederick Starr, Putin's War In Ukraine and the Crimean War), 19fourtyfive, January 2, 2023

Oped S. Frederick Starr, Russia Needs Its Own Charles de Gaulle,  Foreign Policy, July 21, 2022.

2206-StarrSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, Rethinking Greater Central Asia: American and Western Stakes in the Region and How to Advance Them, June 2022 

Oped Svante E. Cornell & Albert Barro, With referendum, Kazakh President pushes for reforms, Euractiv, June 3, 2022.

Oped Svante E. Cornell Russia's Southern Neighbors Take a Stand, The Hill, May 6, 2022.

Silk Road Paper Johan Engvall, Between Bandits and Bureaucrats: 30 Years of Parliamentary Development in Kyrgyzstan, January 2022.  

Oped Svante E. Cornell, No, The War in Ukraine is not about NATO, The Hill, March 9, 2022.

Analysis Svante E. Cornell, Kazakhstan’s Crisis Calls for a Central Asia Policy Reboot, The National Interest, January 34, 2022.

StronguniquecoverBook S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, Strong and Unique: Three Decades of U.S.-Kazakhstan Partnership, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, December 2021.  

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell, S. Frederick Starr & Albert Barro, Political and Economic Reforms in Kazakhstan Under President Tokayev, November 2021.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter