Tuesday, 19 January 2016

Georgia to achieve visa free regime with European Union

Published in Field Reports

By Eka Janashia

January 22nd, the CACI Analyst

On December 18, the European Commission (EC) issued the “Fourth progress report on Georgia’s implementation of the action plan on visa liberalization” approving the country’s progress in fulfilling legislative and policy reforms, and meeting institutional and organizational principles and procedures in line with European and international standards.  The EC’s positive assessment entitles Georgia to visa-free travel with the Schengen area. However, the EC’ legislative proposal, slated to be submitted in early 2016, still needs to be approved by EU member states and the European Parliament.


 hahn-vlapThe process could be completed by mid-2016, and will allow holders of biometric passports to enter the Schengen area multiple times, without visa, for 90 days in any 180-day period. Currently, 776,000 Georgian citizens hold a biometric passport and this prospect will likely encourage a larger share of the population to obtain one.

The visa-free regime will include all EU member states except the United Kingdom and Ireland. It will also apply to Cyprus, Croatia, Romania and Bulgaria – which are not yet part of the Schengen zone; and to non-EU member states such as Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.

The EU-Georgia Visa Liberalization Dialogue was launched in June 2012, under Georgia’s previous government, and continued after the Georgian Dream (GD) coalition’s ascent to power. In 2013, the EC presented Georgian authorities with a visa liberalization action plan (VLAP) enclosing precise benchmarks outlined in four separate “blocks.” The VLAP envisaged two phases, starting with the adoption of a legislative, policy and institutional framework and continuing with ensuring its effective and sustainable implementation.

The appraisal of the implementation of all four blocks started in December 2014 and was completed in October 2015. It was headed by the EC, with participation of the EU Delegation to Georgia, experts from EU Member States and the European External Action Service (EEAS).

The Commission’s fourth report acknowledges that Georgia has allocated considerable financial and human resources to ensure the sustainability of its new achievements. It also appreciates the diligence through which the country has implemented the diverse reforms and terms the attained progress steady and effective.

The visa-free regime with the EU will have various political repercussions for Georgia. First, the “far-reaching and difficult reforms in the Justice and Home Affairs area” will advance the country’s institutional setup in terms of rule of law and democracy. It is indicative that despite the shift in government, integration with the Euro-Atlantic community has remained a top national priority, demonstrating Georgia’s consistent efforts and strong commitment to this objective.

Second, the achieved success could increase support for EU integration in Georgia and at the same time curb the recently emerging and growing Euro-skepticism in the country.

Although the signing of the Association Agreement had a remarkably positive impact in this regard, the visa-free regime could yield more tangible benefits and have a more direct effect on Georgia’s integration with the EU. The possibility of unrestricted travel throughout the Schengen area might encourage Abkhazians and Ossetians to obtain Georgian biometric passports, which could help facilitating the reintegration of the occupied regions.

For the same reason, the decision risks annoying the Kremlin, especially given Russia’s long-lasting efforts to secure visa liberalization with the EU and Brussels’ reluctance to grant it in light of the Ukraine crisis. Another irritating factor for Moscow is Georgia’s steady integration with European institutions to the detriment of Russia’s influence in its former periphery. On December 17, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin expressed readiness to lift visa requirements for Georgian citizens. “Despite all the difficulties … we see signals from the current leadership of Georgia and those signals are received,” Putin said. It should be noted that Moscow initially rebuffed canceling the visa regime until diplomatic relations between the two countries, severed after the August 2008 war, have been restored.

Shortly before leaving office, Georgia’s Prime Minister Irakli Gharibashvili welcomed Putin’s statement, calling it “a step in the right direction.” Gharibashvili asserted that the Georgian Dream government’s reasonable and prudent foreign policy, pursuing constructive dialogue with Russia, is now achieving palpable results.

As shown by Gharibashvili’s stance, the ruling coalition seems keen to attract both pro-European and pro-Russian voters to improve its declining popularity ahead of the parliamentary elections scheduled for October 2016. 

Image attribution: www.agenda.ge, accessed on Jan 19, 2016

Read 10786 times Last modified on Tuesday, 19 January 2016

Visit also





Staff Publications

Op-ed Mamuka Tsereteli & James Jay Carafano, The West Can't Forget What Russia Did To Georgia, 19FortyFive, August 6, 2021. 

Op-ed S. Frederick Starr & Michael Doran, To Avert Disaster in Afghanistan, Look to Central Asia, Wall Street Journal, July 11, 2021.

Op-ed S. Frederick Starr & Eldor Aripov, Can Afghanistan Be Part of An Integrated Central Asia? The National Interest, July 9, 2021.

Op-ed Mamuka Tsereteli and James Jay Carafano, Tsereteli & Carafano: Putin threatens Ukraine – here's the danger and what US, allies should do about it, Fox News, April 13, 2021.

Op-ed S. Enders Wimbish, US withdrawal from Afghanistan spells dangerous geopolitical realignments, The Hill, April 2, 2021.  

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell and S. Frederick Starr, Kazakhstan's Role in International Mediation under First President Nursultan Nazarbayev, November 2020.

Analysis Svante E. Cornell, How Did Armenia So Badly Miscalculate Its War with Azerbaijan? The National Interest, November 14, 2020.

Op-ed Svante E. Cornell, Halting the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan: Russian Peacekeeping is not the Solution Washington Times, October 20, 2020.

Analysis Svante E. Cornell, Can America Stop a Wider War between Armenia and Azerbaijan? The National Interest, October 5, 2020.

Article S. Frederick Starr, America Inches Toward a Serious Central Asia Strategy AFPC Defense Dossier, June 3, 2020.

Silk Road Paper Farrukh Irnazarov and Roman Vakulchuk, Discovering Opportunities in the Pandemic? Four Economic Response Scenarios for Central Asia, July 2020.  

 Book S. Frederick Starr, Eldar Ismailov, Nazim Muzaffarli, Basic Principles for the Rehabilitation of Azerbaijan’s Post-Conflict Territories, 2010.

Can Afghanistan Be Part of An Integrated Central Asia?

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.


Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst