Wednesday, 23 July 2003

RUSSIA ALLOWS GEORGIA TO INSPECT ITS MILITARY BASE

Published in News Digest

By empty (7/23/2003 issue of the CACI Analyst)

Russia has no objection to an inspection of its Gudauta military base in Georgia, said Alexander Yakovenko, the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry. Speaking about the Georgian Parliament’s appeal to Russia to agree to the inspection of the military base, he said: ⌠It is difficult to explain the motives of this appeal. Perhaps, Georgian parliamentarians have not been properly informed on the issue.
Russia has no objection to an inspection of its Gudauta military base in Georgia, said Alexander Yakovenko, the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry. Speaking about the Georgian Parliament’s appeal to Russia to agree to the inspection of the military base, he said: ⌠It is difficult to explain the motives of this appeal. Perhaps, Georgian parliamentarians have not been properly informed on the issue. Of course, we don’t think that this move is aimed at putting additional pressure on bilateral relations. According to Mr. Yakovenko, there is no problem with the military base. Under the Russian-Georgian declaration of 17 November 1999 and the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE), Russia withdrew its weapons and military equipment from Georgia in 2001, and dismantled its Gudauta military base. In July 2001, Russia officially informed all CFE countries about it. Thus, the Gudauta base, where some equipment is used to help the CIS collective forces support peace in the zone of the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict, was closed for inspections within the framework of the treaty. At the same time, Russia did not object to holding an inspection according to Section VIII of the Protocol on Inspections to the CFE Treaty, Mr. Yakovenko stressed. Meanwhile, Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze sent a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin expressing Tbilisi’s ⌠categorical rejection of double standards applied by Russian authorities and their lack of respect for the decision of the heads of CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) countries of 1996, forbidding any unilateral economic and political contacts with Abkhazian separatists without coordination with Georgian leadership. Moscow has not yet reacted to this statement. (RBC)
Read 2071 times

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Staff Publications

  

2410Starr-coverSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, Greater Central Asia as A Component of U.S. Global Strategy, October 2024. 

Analysis Laura Linderman, "Rising Stakes in Tbilisi as Elections Approach," Civil Georgia, September 7, 2024.

Analysis Mamuka Tsereteli, "U.S. Black Sea Strategy: The Georgian Connection", CEPA, February 9, 2024. 

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell, ed., Türkiye's Return to Central Asia and the Caucasus, July 2024. 

ChangingGeopolitics-cover2Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., "The Changing Geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucasus" AFPC Press/Armin LEar, 2023. 

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell and S. Frederick Starr, Stepping up to the “Agency Challenge”: Central Asian Diplomacy in a Time of Troubles, July 2023. 

Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 10.32.15 AM

Silk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, U.S. Policy in Central Asia through Central Asian Eyes, May 2023.



 

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter